Skip to main content

ONS Predicted Population of Britain

Perhaps few people realise that, with a predicted growth of 20% in the population of England, the current levels of immigration into the UK are truly epic and comparable with any of the mass migrations and population replacements anywhere and at any time in world history

The Office of National Statistics has just released its latest projections for the UK population:

The prediction is for a population of 73 million by 2035 on an island that can only optimistically support 40-50 million from its own resources (allowing a 30% margin for bad weather but not for climate change).  The government must be very certain that they can ensure the purchase of food from overseas for the indefinite future or millions of Britons will die one day.  Let us hope that "overseas" does not get equally full of people and we avoid all wars and economic collapses.

The population growth is 400,000 per year of which half in any given year is due to net migration of 200,000 and much of the remaining 200,000 will be children of the newcomers (because they are in that age group). The net effect will be that about 70% of the population increase will be due to migration - as is evident from Table 3 in the report:

Table 3: Projected population growth by component, United Kingdom, 2010 to 2035 (adapted)

Total population increase between 2010 and 2035: 10.9 million

Resulting from:
Assumed net migration:  5.1 million
Additional natural change from assumed level of net migration 2.3 million
Total population increase due to migration: 7.4 million

Natural change assuming zero net migration:  3.5


Almost all of this population growth will occur in England. England is only half the area of the UK but, unlike Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, has no National Assembly to protect its land. The population of England is predicted to grow by an unprecedented amount of 20% in a generation! This is really serious but the people of England are apathetic and don't care.

Table 1: Estimated and projected population of the United Kingdom and constituent countries, 2010 to 2035 millions

                             2010     2015   2020   2025   2030   2035
United Kingdom    62.3      64.8    67.2    69.4    71.4    73.2
England                 52.2      54.5    56.6    58.6    60.4    62.1
Wales                       3.0        3.1      3.2      3.2      3.3     3.4
Scotland                  5.2        5.4       5.5      5.6      5.7     5.8
Northern Ireland     1.8        1.9       1.9      2.0      2.0     2.0
Note: Figures may not sum due to rounding


The area of England is 50.000 square miles, if we include all rivers, roads and mountains this gives us half an acre each in 2035. Thank you HM Government.

Idiot journalists are, as usual, misreporting, saying that the component due to immigration is only 50% when the ONS says it is 7.4 million of a 10.9 million increase, ie: 68%. I do not know who the journalists think they are protecting, the massive population growth will afflict the recent immigrant as much as the people who are already here. This is real, not about attitudes.

The problem with population growth is that it makes it appear as if the whole economy is growing because each new person needs new clothes, housing etc. However, per capita growth is low and if the population growth were to cease the economic growth would cease.  The economy has not improved, all that has happened is that the land has been sold and subdivided.  This form of growth is good for the rich but no good at all for the people and the land.

The new population projections talk in terms of Net Migration and do not consider Immigration as anything but the input side of the equation. Every year 550,000 foreign people arrive in Britain and 350,000 largely indigenous people leave. This would result in about a further 10-15 million people being new or first generation British, which, including recent immigration, would make a total of over 20 million, about 30% of the population being either immigrant or children of immigrants by 2035. These will constitute nearly half of the population under 40 years of age. (See Office of National Statistics Figures, Review of these figures.

The graph above shows the scale of UK immigration. ONS Data. ( Immigration into the UK accounts for 30% of all EU population growth. Immigration over 250000 a year is "mass immigration". See Predicted population of Britain.)
Apparently the UK, and especially England, is going to cope with the social and political consequences of this wholesale replacement of the native population by 2035. We know why Labour began this huge dislocation of the people in 1997 (see Roots of New Labour) the only mystery was why it was supported by the English. Perhaps few people realise that the current levels of immigration, introduced by Labour in 1997, are truly epic and comparable with any of the mass migrations and population replacements anywhere and at any time in world history.  Compare the immigration with the movement into the USA during the nineteenth century: for the period from 1847 through 1930, the average yearly volume was 434,000, for the UK it is now over 500,000.  The USA is virtually a continent, the UK is a small island yet Britain has 2.5 times the rate of immigration per person that the USA currently sustains.
 The change in population in England will be especially challenging, as can be seen from the chart above, the current native population being replaced progressively over the 21st century. (The chart above is extrapolated from ONS data, fertility, migration and death rates and not provided by the ONS).

My own suspicion is that class hatred means that the English hate each other more than anyone or anything else and this needs to be played out until there are no indigenous English left, the land is overrun with development and the people are starving towards the end of the century. We really should not be inviting people from overseas to share such a nightmare (See Global warming: what do we do now?.).

Is this population growth good for Britain in any way?  Well, some people say it corrects the pension crisis. Experts on pensions differ:
"So despite having chaired the UK’s Pensions
Commission for three years, I think it is highly likely
that the UK faces a too-fast population growth, i.e.
population growth which is faster than welfare-
optimizing growth, would be for the existing popu-
lation." (Turner 2009)

Incidentally, if you are anti-immigration you have a democratic tool, just never vote Labour again, Labour set up the current mass migration in 1997 - just look at the migration graphs.

Can this migration be stopped?

 Curiously very little immigration is due to Asylum Seekers - Asylum Seekers were singled out by Labour to tug at the heart strings of the electorate.  Most immigration is invited and official.  All that needs to be done is to stop inviting people.



(Graph from: The migration Observatory), notice how, in the upper chart, it is clear that Labour began the mass migration in 1997.

We could stop this now by putting the brakes on immigration. If you are young and want any space, whether you are black, white or brown,  lobby your MP to stop immigration now.  Not only will it be impossible to own a house, with climate change and rising world food prices you may well find yourself dying in 2035 if we are misgoverned into such high population increases - oh well, its nature's way of correcting for insane government.

But really, the people governing us must be rotten to the core.  If we experience war, famine, climate change or economic collapse and millions die then our current politicians should be prosecuted and locked away forever as mass murderers.
 
Most people don't even realise that this population increase was deliberate Labour policy and continue voting Labour! Its hilarious! You can also just laugh at the Greens - they want us to use bikes and then  acquiesce in the concreting over of the country, you can just split your sides at the Socialists, they talk of public services and work for all and would happily pour millions of the poor and dislocated into the country so destroying any possibility of improvement for generations.

The electorate must simply stop voting for parties that have supported immigration.  This means don't vote Labour or Lib Dem.  Remember that Labour lie about immigration, they say they will stop it in their manifesto then continue with business as usual. Never vote Labour again.  The predicted increase in population is a far greater threat than any economic crisis, it could result in the deaths of your children or grandchildren if climate change is as serious as predicted or the global system goes into meltdown, as is also predicted.  Supporting further immigration is not just rash, it is insane.

Link to this article in Twitter with:  http://tinyurl.com/qb6blkf

See

The limits to growth

Other sources:
Tony Blair defends open door policy on immigration.
Labour wanted mass migration


See Also:
The origins of the English
The UK Housing Crisis

The benefits of immigration to the UK economy

Immigration, house prices and boom economics

Reference

Turner A (2009). Population ageing: what should we
worry about? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B, 364, 3009 – 3021.


Incidentally, the figures for immigration are inconsistent, consider this chart of the numbers of National Insurance Numbers issued:

Comments

peejay said…
Truly frightening reading. Your advice (don't vote Labour) hardly addresses the issue.
The next election is 2 years away, and the Tories are just as bad as Labour. But the blame really lies with the the gormless apathetic electorate. Support for the LabCons is still high, while UKIP is still low. The English are terrified of not being seen to be 'nice', and refuse to demonstrate or voice their opinions.

Even more ridiculous is the fact that younger people tend to support immigration, and they are the ones who will inherit this nightmare - well, serves them right!

Of course,even if we had a referendum on Europe, as lying Dave promises, they can ignore the results.

You may delete this as 'incitement', but I think a coup d'etat is the only answer.

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b