Skip to main content

Labour confirms multiculturalism and mass immigration are bad

In two broadcasts today (see Too little done to integrate UK Society) Ed Miliband, the Labour leader and Sadiq Khan, the shadow Justice Secretary, said that Labour had been mistaken not to tackle the "realities of segregation".  Miliband rejected Labour's previous policy  where people "live side by side in their own communities, respecting each other but living separate lives, protected from hatreds but never building a common bond - never learning to appreciate one another".

It is good to see that Labour have come to terms with the fact that multiculturalism was a vicious Labour policy and a mistake.

Miliband is also renouncing mass immigration: " in his speech he will make clear he would consider keeping the government's cap on migration from outside the EU if there is evidence that it works".
The graph above shows the scale of UK immigration. ONS Data. Notice how Labour started mass migration in 1997 as a policy. ( Immigration into the UK accounts for 30% of all EU population growth. Immigration over 250000 a year is "mass immigration". See Predicted population of Britain.)

Those who still support multiculturalism and immigration are usually not numerate.  They do not understand that over 500,000 immigrants a year in a small island is an epic and impossible number.  They are still living in the days of the racist/anti-racist arguments of the 1980s when immigration involved relatively few immigrants and have not moved on to address the industrial scale of immigration that we see today.

A word of warning. Labour have always said that they will control immigration and believe in integration when it has suited them.  In 2009, after Andrew Neather confessed that Labour had a deliberate policy of mass immigration a Labour Home Office spokesman said:

“The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”

Lies, damn lies.  Judge Labour by its record and never vote for them again.  Never vote Tory or Lib-Dem again either.

All we need now is for politicians to stop making racist statements such as how much better it is to be in a modern society rather than in a society filled with white English people.  They always get applauded for such statements by their postmarxist audience but this is naked racism.  How else would one explain the massive changes in our society except with the realisation that the postmarxists are authoritarian racists who have made our children into racists (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism ).  It is time that the young threw off the shackles of this indoctrination and stopped seeing the world in postmarxist black and white.

If you found this article interesting link to it, tweet it (TinyURL  http://tinyurl.com/arhxjjv ),  and tell your friends!  Even Labour says that mass immigration and multiculturalism are wrong but it continues.  Only the BBC support it now.  How will it stop if you say nothing? 

See also:

Multiculturalism

The devastating effects of immigration on the economy and society of the UK

ONS: The predicted population of the UK

Is the pro-immigration lobby racist?

Against racism

Global warming: what do we do now?

Should universities and colleges be financed by offering residence in the UK?

Immigration, house prices and boom economics

The UK Housing Crisis


Tony Blair defends open door policy on immigration.

Labour wanted mass migration

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b

The Report on Racism

The " Report by the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities " has just been published.  The Commissioners were nearly all from BAME backgrounds and have produced a robust and fair Report. The Report identified a class divide in which the cycle of advantage maintains a section of the population in wealth and leaves the large bulk of the population in relative poverty.   The wealthy class is largely white British but the poorer class consists of large numbers of white British and other ethnic groups.  This class divide causes a bias in the crude statistics on disadvantage so that majority, poor white British are labelled as "white supremacists" etc. when it is the small wealthy class that actually creates the disparity that causes this analysis. The most striking finding is that different ethnic groups had very different experiences and outcomes.  Educational outcomes demonstrate this at a glance: Red text added for this article Most ethnic groups had better outcome