Skip to main content

Stafford NHS, Horse Meat and Banker Crime

Who is to blame?
Serious crimes are being committed but no-one is being punished.  

I have not commented on the Stafford Hospital Scandal or the Horse Meat fraud because they have taken some time to mature and are closely linked.

The Stafford Hospital Scandal was hushed up by the Government, the Royal College of Nursing and the local NHS Trust, responsibility for investigating the negligence fell between the NHS, HSE, Health Department, BMA, RCN and Police and no-one is being prosecuted yet.  The worst crime committed would be Gross Negligence Manslaughter, applicable to the nurses and administrators involved but the NHS itself might be charged with corporate manslaughter.

The Horse Meat fraud (the fraudulent substitution of horse meat for beef) was kept silent by government until after David Cameron's "we must stay in the EU" speech because it demonstrated a failure in EU Regulations,  it also involved divided responsibility for investigating the fraud between Environmental Health, Food Standards Authority, Europe and the Police and no-one is being prosecuted.

Banker Crime is ongoing and was hushed up in the period 2000-2008, responsibility for investigating it fell between the FSA, SFO, Bank of England and the Police, no-one in the major banks has been prosecuted.

There is a pattern here.  Regulation and enforcement is diffuse, the police and Crown Prosecution Service do not identify when crimes are being committed and no-one is punished.

This failure to regulate, enforce and prosecute is having dire consequences.  The crimes spread and multiply, not content with killing its patients the NHS illegally gags and buys off whistleblowers , the banks realise they can get away with anything and cheat their customers everywhere and the EU and government think it is better to hide fraud or shrug it off than to pursue it.

The heart of the problem lies with the police, CPS, judiciary and penal system.  The police must be clear that when an activity becomes fraud or negligence bordering on manslaughter they must intervene.  However, it is no use for the police to intervene, the CPS to prosecute and millions to be spent just so that the criminals can have a relaxing holiday in open prison for a few months (see note) before enjoying their ill-gotten gains.  The judiciary and penal system must be reformed so that they take firm action.

White collar crimes are often given derisory penalties and those convicted go to open prison where they serve as little as 25% of their sentence before release. If you are just negligently killing a couple of thousand patients or fraudulently selling billions in insurance you will not be prosecuted. This failure of the CPS to prosecute and the judiciary to sentence adequately was the true message of Leveson Inquiry into the Press but seemed to be missed by the media.
 
White collar crime pays, sentences are now so derisory that newspapers say "the six men were sentenced to a total of 18 years" because each individual is virtually let off.  Whether it is cheating charities of millions, Credit card fraud for millions, fraudulently selling millions of pounds worth of fake shares or defrauding the entire British public of hundreds of billions you will either fail to be prosecuted or be given 30 months and actually serve 8 months in open prison.  White collar crime pays millions of pounds per year spent in jail.

White collar crime is a calculated risk.  These criminals deliberately weigh up the chances of being caught and the possible punishment against the financial and other rewards.  Punishment is a huge deterrent for white collar criminals and these criminals must be punished.  All proceeds of such crimes, such as government pensions for civil servants and actual wealth must be seized and any status such as Knighthoods removed.

Serious crimes are being committed but no-one is being punished.  This is usually a sign of corruption.

If you found this article interesting link to it, tweet it (TinyURL  http://tinyurl.com/b3gdalh ),  and tell your friends! If you don't act then who will?  


POLITICAL THOUGHTS click here to see the whole POLITICAL THOUGHTS magazine POLITICAL THOUGHTS!

See also:

The Leveson Inquiry and Report into the Press

Note: "The 109 persons convicted in Serious Fraud Office cases 2000-2005 received an average of 31.7 months imprisonment; half of them got 3 years or less. The average sentence imposed on the most severely sentenced person per case was 37.7 months’ imprisonment. Eight persons received sentences longer than five years; 19 people received 4-5 year sentences; and 22 people (mostly co-defendants in cases where others were imprisoned) received non-custodial sentences." Sentencing Frauds: A review - Cardiff University


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more