Skip to main content

Why people are voting UKIP - the EU and TTIP

The British are voting for UKIP because the main parties make promises to get votes and then just ignore them when they are in power.

In the past both parties have promised to have a referendum on Europe and both parties have promised to cut migration.  These are important issues, the population of England is growing so rapidly as a result of immigration that it is undermining the NHS and creating youth unemployment and havoc in the housing market.  All of the main parties have promised to act on Europe and Migration over the past 20 years but none have acted.  All they have done is to order the BBC to tell us that there is no problem.  Voting Labour, Tory or Lib-Dem is a wasted vote.  Whatever they promise at an election they simply ignore in government.  Why do the electorate waste their votes?

The move towards UKIP shows that not all electors are complacent or afraid or racists who want to destroy all diversity of nations.  Whether or not UKIP is the right choice for government it is a better choice than the existing political elite.

The Westminister elite have promised referendums if there are any major transfers of sovereignty to Europe but a complete transfer has already occurred.  When the Lisbon Treaty is implemented in November 2014 there will no longer be any need for further transfers.  The Westminster elite have kept this dirty deal secret.

Cameron promises action on migration but the Lisbon Treaty IS a treaty about the free movement of people in the EU.  Cameron knows this and is trying to fool everyone:

"2. The Union shall offer its citizens an area of freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers, in which the free movement of persons is ensured in conjunction with appropriate measures with respect to external border controls, asylum, immigration and the prevention and combating of crime." .Para 2. Article 3. Lisbon Treaty.


TTIP: The birth of a superstate.
The EU is an internationalising machine.  Its goal is global government.  Now that Lisbon is "in the bag" the EU is moving towards an EU-US merger to make the West a single country.  The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, TTIP is simply a transatlantic EEC that the EU, with its apparatus for political mergers, will turn into an even bigger superstate.  The Americans will be surprised that this is happening because they have never come across the secrecy and subversion of the EU - the British signed away their sovereignty at Lisbon and hardly any British people realise it has happened so the Americans will also be fooled!


UKIP opposes the EU and TTIP.  

There can be no doubt that global government will result in tyranny.  We are falling into the hands of cowardly fanatics who are determined to destroy the diversity of the world.  The way forward is to create a legal system to govern the relations between countries, not the merger of all countries into an unaccountable state that will oppress mankind for a millennium.

Where did the lying begin? Politicians have always lied but now they lie all the time.  They lie because the laws against free speech mean that offending people can be illegal so not offending people is more important than free speech.  I will not bore you with tracing the growth in lies back to when free speech was first gagged in the UK.  Free speech is saying what you mean, it is honesty.  Democracy is fatally undermined if free speech is illegal because subversive policies cannot be exposed and social conflicts cannot be diffused.

Also see:

Membership of the EU: pros and cons.

Is Internationalism the ultimate racism?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Falklands have always been Argentine - Las Malvinas son Argentinas

"The Falklands have always been Argentine" is taught to every Argentine child as a matter of faith.  What was Argentina during the time when it "always" possessed Las Malvinas?  In this article I will trace the history of Argentina in the context of its physical and political relationship with "Las Malvinas", the Falkland Islands.  The Argentine claim to the Falkland Islands dates from a brief episode in 1831-32 so it is like Canada claiming the USA despite two centuries of separate development. This might sound like ancient history but Argentina has gone to war for this ancient claim so the following article is well worth reading. For a summary of the legal case see: Las Malvinas: The Legal Case Argentina traces its origins to Spanish South America when it was part of the Viceroyalty of the Rio del Plata.  The Falklands lay off the Viceroyalty of Peru, controlled by the Captain General of Chile.  In 1810 the Falklands were far from the geographical b
35 comments
Read more

Practical Idealism by Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi

Coudenhove-Kalergi was a pioneer of European integration. He was the founder and President for 49 years of the Paneuropean Union. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, the daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and huge landowner family in Tokyo. His "Pan-Europa" was published in 1923 and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 the French Prime Minister, Aristide Briand was elected honorary president.  Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud. Figures who later became central to founding the EU, such as Konrad Adenauer became members . His basic idea was that democracy was a transitional stage that leads to rule by a new aristocracy that is largely taken from the Jewish "master race" (Kalergi's terminology). His movement was reviled by Hitler and H
1 comment
Read more

Membership of the EU: pros and cons

5th December 2013, update May 2016 Nigel Lawson, ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer,  recently criticised the UK membership of the EU , the media has covered his mainstream view as if he is a bad boy starting a fight in the school playground, but is he right about the EU? What has changed that makes EU membership a burning issue?  What has changed is that the 19 countries of the Eurozone are now seeking political union to escape their financial problems.   Seven further EU countries have signed up to join the Euro but the British and Danish have opted out.  The EU is rapidly becoming two blocks - the 26 and Britain and Denmark.   Lawson's fear was that if Britain stays in the EU it will be isolated and dominated by a Eurozone bloc that uses "unified representation of the euro area" , so acting like a single country which controls 90% of the vote in the EU with no vetoes available to the UK in most decisions.  The full plans for Eurozone political union ( EMU Stage
15 comments
Read more